Wednesday, March 30, 2011

April 1 Early Release Activities for Homestead Faculty

Given the HSST vote in favor of the trimester concept, the Homestead faculty will continue exploring the trimester concept as they prepare to cast their feedback ballots during the week of April 11.  This whole-faculty vote is for feedback and information purposes only; the result of the voting does not determine whether or not the trimester schedule will be implemented in 2012-2013.

During early release time on Friday, April 1 faculty members will continue to investigate the ramifications of a possible move to the trimester schedule.  This investigation/discussion will center around implications for curriculum, instruction and assessment. 

A document that faculty members will receive on Friday includes the following:

"Implementation of the five-period trimester schedule beginning in the 2012-2013 school year would impact curriculum, instruction and assessment across content areas.  A move to the trimester represents a paradigm shift in teaching and learning practices as much as it represents a change in when the bells ring or when grades are assigned.

As a school, we will need to ensure a viable (course content and skills can be taught in the time frame provided—number of instructional days, length of periods) and guaranteed (students reach the same outcomes regardless of instructor) curriculum for students.  Instructional practices need to maximize the opportunities that come with extended-period teaching and learning.  Assessment practices, from the amount and type of out-of-class work assigned to the frequency and type of summative assessments given, need to be reconsidered."

On Friday, the entire faculty will gather to learn more about the trimester schedule and the philosophy that must drive its successful implementation.  Then, they will spend the remainder of the afternoon identifying the opportunities, challenges, priorities and needs around curriculum, instruction, and assessment planning and redesign that could exist if the trimester proposal moves from concept to reality; these conversations will occur in discipline-specific breakout groups.  This exercise does not represent the development of a formal plan of action; instead, it is a proactive measure aimed at equipping faculty members with the insight that they need to make an informed decision when voting in mid-April.

Result of March 30 HSST Vote

This afternoon, March 30, the HSST convened to vote on the trimester proposal. 

Of the 21 members on the team, 19 cast ballots, with one vote cast absentee.  The vote was 19-0 in support of the trimester proposal. 

While all parents, students, administrators and faculty members participated in the voting, both School Board members abstained.  They did so to maintain the integrity of the decision-making process moving forward. If Eric Dimmitt and I recommend a move to the trimester schedule in the report that we will present to the Board in May, the full Board will need to make the final decision about this matter; they will do so after considering the feedback that they receive during their study and consideration phase. That feedback will come from faculty members, administrators, students, parents, and community members. By abstaining from voting now, the Board members on the HSST affirmed their open minds about this topic moving forward.

For your information, the text of the ballot that HSST members received today is printed below:

The trimester schedule at Homestead High School would be developed based on the following parameters/drivers:
  • Students are required to enroll in at least four classes per trimester
  • Teachers teach four classes per trimester
  • Three-trimester courses are limited to preserve student choice, maintain financial neutrality, and manage class sizes; administrators determine the length of courses with input and feedback from instructors; music courses run for three trimesters
  • Flex time is included in the schedule; the frequency, length and timing of flex periods will be determined at a later date
  • Available hours beyond the DPI requirement of 1,137 are used to provide flex time in the schedule and to provide release time during final exams as available
  • As a rule and not an exception, teachers are expected to provide three unique interactions with content in a given period; at least one of those interactions must require class-wide verbal participation from students
  • Curricula are reviewed and revised prior to implementation of the trimester to ensure their viability in the trimester arrangement
  • Teachers collaborate with peers and administrators prior to implementation of the trimester to increase alignment of outcomes and expectations for courses taught by multiple teachers
  • Early release, faculty learning, and available MTAP and summer curriculum time in the summer of 2011, throughout the 2011-12 school year, and in the summer of 2012 are dedicated to curriculum, instruction and assessment review and revision.
As a member of the Homestead Schedule Study Team and based on the research and learning that occurred between October and March of the 2010-2011 school year, I am committed to the trimester concept as outlined above and believe that the schedule should be implemented beginning in the 2012-2013 school year.

            ______               Yes
           
            ______               No

Given the results of today's vote, the following opportunities now exist for parent/community learning and engagement about the trimester schedule proposal:
  • April 12:  Parent information and feedback meeting, Egelhoff Conference Room, 1:00 p.m.
  • April 12:  Parent information and feedback meeting, Homestead library, 7:00 p.m.
  • April 13:  Parent information and feedback meeting, Homestead library, 7:00 p.m.
  • April 18:  Working School Board meeting, Egelhoff Conference Room, time TBA
  • May 16:  School Board meeting at which schedule study report will be presented, Egelhoff Conference Room, 7:00 p.m.
  • June 20:  School Board meeting, Egelhoff Conference Room, 7:00 p.m.
  • July 18:  School Board meeting, Egelhoff Conference Room, 7:00 p.m.

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Schedule Study and Trimester FAQ


1.  Why is a schedule change for 2012-2013 being considered?
Last spring, the School Board and teachers association agreed to open the question of the high school schedule in the 2011-2012 school year.  Concerns were continually raised about the lack of study/process that preceded the move to the current school schedule, which was implemented three years ago, and about the sustainability of this schedule in increasingly challenging financial times.  When the Homestead Schedule Study Team (HSST) began meeting in October, the group affirmed three criteria for a new schedule: (1) it should enable professional collaboration among teachers, (2) it should relieve some of the burdens associated with the current seven-period schedule, and (3) it should enable the maintenance or improvement of student achievement.  The HSST has been operating under the School Board’s requirement that any proposed schedule is cost-neutral, meaning that it does not require the hiring of additional faculty or staff.

2.  When and how will the question of moving to the trimester schedule be made?
If the HSST supports a move to the trimester when it votes on March 30, parents, students and faculty members will have chances to provide input during meetings to be held the week of April 11.  Parent information and feedback meetings will occur during daytime (1:00 on April 12) and evening (7:00 on April 12 and 13) time slots.  After considering input from the HSST, parents, students and faculty members, Homestead Principal Brett Bowers and MTSD Director of Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Eric Dimmitt will report to the School Board in May; that report could include a recommendation to move to the trimester in 2012-2013.  If that recommendation is made, follow-up Board discussions would take place in June and July. The Board of Education would be asked to act on the administrative recommendation in July.  Only School Board action can change the schedule.

3.  Who is on the HSST?
The 21-member Homestead Schedule Study Team is comprised of the Homestead High School principal; the MTSD Director of Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment; two School Board members; three parents; two students, a freshman and a sophomore; a guidance counselor; the 6-12 curriculum specialist/Pursuit coordinator; and 10 teachers representing the English, Math, Science, Social Studies, World Language, Special Education, Music and Allied Arts Departments.

4.  How and when can parents provide input on the schedule decision?
As mentioned above, information and feedback sessions with Mr. Bowers and/or Mr. Dimmitt will occur in April if the trimester concept is approved at the committee level on March 30.  Parents are also encouraged to attend School Board meetings around this topic, including the April 18 working Board meeting and the regular School Board meetings in May, June and July.

5.  Will students lose choices when developing their schedules in the trimester?
In the current semester schedule, students have the ability to earn up to seven credits per year.  In the trimester schedule, students can earn up to 7.5 credits each school year.  So, many students will be able to take more courses over a single year than they do now.  Some students who choose to take multiple three-trimester courses might find that they can take slightly fewer courses in a year than in the current schedule.

6.  Would a move to the trimester schedule have a negative effect on students’ college admissions prospects?
Based on the research conducted over the past several months, no evidence of a trimester schedule negatively impacting college admissions can be found.  If a move to the trimester schedule occurs, the school will send two profiles to colleges and universities when submitting student transcripts; one profile will explain the previous semester schedule and the other will explain the current trimester.

7.  In the trimester schedule, who would determine which courses meet for three trimesters?
The question of which current year-long courses would be taught over two or three trimesters would be answered administratively.  Building and district-level administrators would make these decisions with input from teachers and after reviewing information about the scope and sequence of current courses.  Most current yearlong courses would be taught over two trimesters.

8.  Could a student have two different teachers for each half of a current year-long course like Algebra or Biology?
Yes, students could have different teachers for each half of a two-trimester course, as happens occasionally in the current semester schedule.  Teachers understand that curriculum alignment work would need to occur between the time of the schedule change decision and the fall of 2012 to ensure that all teachers of the same course are teaching to the same outcomes and covering the same essential content, ensuring that students could transition smoothly from one teacher to another. 

9.  Does having two teachers for a course have a negative impact on students?
In talking with dozens and dozens of students who currently learn in the trimester, school and district officials heard few concerns or complaints about the schedule.  Regarding teacher changing for a two-trimester course, most students explained that they like seeing more teachers and experiencing more teaching styles in a given year and throughout their high school career.  They also appreciate having a fresh start with a new teacher if they feel that the working relationship with a previous teacher was not as strong as they had hoped.  Students expressed no concerns about being able to develop strong and meaningful relationships with teachers in the trimester schedule.

10.  Would music classes run for three trimesters?
It is likely that all band, choir and orchestra courses would run for three trimesters if the schedule was adopted.  Because of the way that music staffing is allocated at the high school level, allowing all music courses to run for three trimesters would not affect the overall cost of staffing.  If music courses run for three trimesters, a music student would still have space in his/her schedule to earn up to six additional credits.  In the current semester schedule, a student who takes a music course can earn six additional credits as well.  Finally, because the balance of sound for a performing group can be substantially altered with the addition or loss of vocalists/instrumentalists, three trimester music courses ensure the quality of those ensembles.

11.  Would all AP courses run for three trimesters?
No, most AP courses would not run for three trimesters.  Instead, like almost all other yearlong courses in the semester schedule, most AP courses would run for two trimesters.  Because of the scope of the curriculum for some especially intense AP courses, certain ones may need to run for three trimesters.  A three-trimester AP course would be the exception and not the rule.

12.  How will students who take two-trimester AP courses remain ready for the AP exams in early-mid May?
Administrators are committed to providing a structural solution to addressing the gap between the end of a two-trimester AP course and the AP exams.  This solution will consist of some form of resource or student assistance period embedded in the school day.  During that time, which would occur possibly twice weekly, AP teachers would be able to hold review/refresher sessions for interested students.  Any trimester schedule recommendation will include a recommendation for some sort of resource/student assistance period.  Options for when and how this time would be offered to students and teachers is currently being researched and discussed.

13.  Can students remain prepared for an AP test even with a gap between the end of a course and the exam?
Local and regional-level research around this topic illustrates that students can be highly successful on AP exams even when experiencing an instructional gap.  For example, students at Homestead currently take AP Micro Economics during first semester only.  They experience a gap of almost four months between the end of the course and the AP exam.  Nonetheless, students historically perform extremely well on the exam; over the past 16 years, 891 Homestead students have taken the AP Micro Economics exam, those students passing the test over 82% of the time.  In 2007, 93% of students passed the exam.  At Seaholm High School in Birmingham, Michigan (a regional benchmark school and district), students have set school records for AP exam success since the school moved to the trimester schedule four years ago.

14.  Will the trimester schedule have a negative effect on AP enrollments?
Administrators do not believe that a move to the trimester will result in a decline in AP course enrollments.  When representatives from Homestead and MTSD visited two high-performing trimester high schools in Michigan, North Farmington and Seaholm, officials from those schools shared that their AP enrollments and percentages of tests passed have increased since moving to the trimester.  Currently, four trimester schools in Michigan outrank Homestead in the Newsweek ranking of top public high schools in the country.  Each of those schools has a higher AP test participation rate than Homestead, indicating that students can maintain a commitment to AP in the trimester schedule.

15.  Would any non-AP and non-music courses run for three trimesters?
Yes, it is possible that some other courses could run for three trimesters.  While three-trimester courses need to be included only sparingly in the schedule, certain academic and curricular needs may necessitate this allowance.

16.  Would students be allowed to take study hall in the trimester schedule?
Yes, students would be allowed to enroll in up to one period of study hall per trimester.  That study hall has the ability to be seasonal (fall, winter, spring) to correspond to athletic/activity seasons.

17.  How would special education and other learning support services be offered in the trimester schedule?
As is the case in the current schedule, students will still have access to study hall alternatives like Special Education Guided Study classes and placement in the Academic Success Center. 

18.  How are students affected by the gap in instruction that can occur between two halves of a course in the trimester?
In the trimester, students take the two parts of a current yearlong course in either trimesters 1 and 2, 2 and 3, or 1 and 3.  When investigating high schools currently teaching on the trimester, data could not be found to illustrate that students who take a course in trimesters 1 and 3 (meaning that they experience a mid-year gap) suffer academically.  In fact, North Farmington High School, which has been on the trimester for four years and has gathered detailed grade-related data over that time, found that students who experience the gap actually earn better grades for the second half of a course compared to students who take the course in trimesters 2 and 3.

19.  What about students who finish a course at the end of trimester 2 in one year and don’t start the next course in sequence until the beginning of trimester 2 the following year?
This gap can exist in the trimester schedule.  Some courses that students take in a particular sequence, Biology and Chemistry, for example, while taught back-to-back, are not necessarily tightly sequenced in terms of the content of the curricula.  So, a gap in those courses is not as concerning.  In courses for which that sequencing is tighter, World Language courses, for example, students who experienced difficulty in one level of a course would be given special consideration for taking the next level beginning in trimester 1 the following year.  This approach is currently employed in successful high schools that teach on the trimester or 4x4 block schedules, each of which creates a gap in instruction like this.

20.  How would curricula be redesigned to correspond to the instructional minutes and number of course meeting days that exist in the trimester?
Teachers and administrators have been discussing the need to reconsider curricula if the move to the trimester is made.  If the schedule change occurs, curricula need to be redesigned to be viable within the parameters of the trimester.  Some topics that are currently covered in certain courses, topics that are extensions and not necessarily the focal elements of courses, may need to be put aside or taught as enrichment for select students in this schedule.  Teachers would spend the time between the schedule change decision and the implementation of the new schedule preparing for this change.  In the trimester approach, teachers must embrace the concept of teaching for mastery, promoting retention of knowledge and skills, and emphasizing depth over breadth.  A move to the trimester schedule gives teachers and administrators the opportunity to examine our current curricula, re-affirm it, and make changes and revisions that can improve student learning.

21.  How will questions of what gets taught in trimester courses be determined?
To ensure that the narrowing and enriching of the curriculum focuses on the appropriate knowledge and skills, teachers and administrators will rely on the new Common Core standards for English and Math.  Those standards, developed in cooperation with and endorsed by ACT, were recently adopted in Wisconsin.  Further, the ACT College Readiness Benchmarks can guide decision-making in some other core areas.  In and outside the core, the Standards for Success research project (sponsored by the Association of American Universities and the Pew Charitable Trust) will provide additional insight and guidelines.  In courses that emphasize hands-on work, teachers may find themselves able to expand the scope of their curricula based on the added work time that students have with fewer set-up and take-down experiences between work sessions.

22.  Are 70-minute periods too long to sustain student focus and attention?
When site visit teams observed classes in three trimester schools this spring, all observers noticed high levels of student engagement and focus throughout class periods.  These observations were consistent regardless of the content area or academic level of course.  Consistently, students learning in the trimester explained that they do not find class periods to be too lengthy.  When teaching in an extended period like that offered in the trimester, teachers must embrace a commitment to providing multiple engagements with the content in a single class period.  Unless conducting a lab or doing some other hands-on project, Homestead teachers would be required to include at least three engagements/two transitions per period; at least one of those engagements must include class-wide verbal communication from students.  If the trimester schedule is approved, faculty learning and staff development time over the next two summers and the 2011-2012 school year will focus on lesson design in the trimester.  And, teachers will have opportunities to learn and practice different instructional strategies that they can incorporate into their lessons to diversify their instructional approaches as needed. 

23.  How would final exams and exam exemptions work in the trimester schedule?
Different trimester schools conduct final exams differently.  Administrators are currently investigating options for how final exams might run in a trimester setting.  As the current exam exemption policy is based on the seven-period semester schedule, that policy would need to be reconsidered and revised before the trimester schedule is implemented.

24.  Isn’t Neenah High School moving away from the trimester schedule due to financial constraints?  How can MTSD afford this schedule?
Neenah High School, which has been on the trimester schedule for the past 15 years, is moving away from that schedule after this year.  Finances drove that decision, not parent, student, administrator or teacher preference.  In Neenah, teachers only teach 10/15 classes per year (four classes in one trimester and three classes in the other two trimesters).  At Homestead, teachers would teach 12/15 classes per year (four classes in each of the three trimesters).  While Neenah tried to adjust the number of classes that teachers teach each year so as to realize financial savings and maintain the trimester schedule, they were unable to reach an agreement between their school board and teachers union.  As such, starting next year, teachers at Neenah High School will continue to teach 10 classes per year, but they will do so in a seven-period semester schedule, meaning that they will teach 10/14 classes instead of 10/15 classes, resulting in the need for fewer teachers.

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

What Does the March 30 HSST Vote Mean?

As I shared in an earlier post, on March 30--following six months of study--the HSST will vote on whether or not to support the trimester schedule concept here at Homestead.

The March 30 vote is what I have often referred to as a "gatekeeper" vote.  The vote does not result in action; it does not determine the schedule at Homestead in 2012-2013 and beyond.  Instead, it opens or closes the door to future action.  If the team rejects the schedule, the process stops.  If the team largely supports the schedule, the concept moves forward for further consideration, feedback, and possible action.  During the week of April 11, faculty members would cast feedback ballots, expressing their commitment or non-commitment to the trimester concept.  Daytime and evening parent meetings would be held to provide information and seek input.  Lunchtime student meetings would be held for the same purpose.

In short, the HSST vote is not a final decision about what the schedule will be; it is a decision about what the schedule should be based on the opinions of a group of parents, teachers, students and administrators who have committed to studying schedules since October of 2010.

If the HSST supports the trimester schedule, Eric Dimmitt, Director of Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment, and I will make a final report to the School Board--which may include a recommendation to adopt the schedule--in May.  If that recommendation is made, the School Board will make the final decision about what change, if any, should occur to the bell schedule here at Homestead.

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Current Topics of Discussion for the HSST

The HSST continues to meet, anticipating a vote on the trimester schedule proposal on March 30.  Over the past two weeks, the team identified three essential questions/topics that members want to continue researching and discussing prior to the vote.  These issues were prioritized based on the fact that one or more members identified them as essential questions that needed additional explanation/study/discussion before a firm opinion on the trimester schedule could be developed.

The three questions/topics are:
1.  Could the current MTSD graduation requirement of 22 credits be increased if the trimester schedule was implemented?
2.  What courses would be offered for three trimesters if the schedule was implemented, what impact would three-trimester courses have on students' and teachers' schedules, and how would decisions about the length of courses be made?
3.  What options for flexible time exist in the trimester schedule as it could be implemented at Homestead, and what are the pro's and con's of those options?

Topic #1:  Graduation Requirements
At the most recent HSST meeting, team members learned that the School Board is willing to discuss and reconsider the current 22-credit graduation requirement if the trimester schedule is recommended and approved.  Ultimately, graduation requirements are a policy matter that requires School Board action to be adjusted. 

The HSST is no longer studying or discussing this issue.

Topic #2:  Three-trimester Courses
HSST members continue to discuss this topic, a key point of consideration for the past several months.  At the most recent HSST meeting, team members reviewed enrollment data for AP and music at Homestead, as music and select AP courses are some of the courses that might be allocated three trimesters if the schedule change was to occur.  Currently, approximately one-fifth of all students is enrolled in one or more AP courses; approximately one-quarter of students is enrolled in a music course; approximately one-tenth of students is enrolled in both a music and AP course. 

In examining the charge of the team and the elements of the trimester schedule, everyone understands and agrees that three-trimester courses need to be offered sparingly in that schedule.  Two primary factors drive that decision:  (1) for the schedule to remain cost-neutral, meaning that no additional teachers can be hired, most current year-long courses (two terms) need to remain two-term courses, keeping staffing needs even between the semester and trimester, (2) regardless of the number of teachers that a school employs, the more three-trimester courses that exist in the schedule, the more difficult it is for students to take their preferred courses. 

The HSST will continue to discuss this topic at its next meeting. 

Topic #3:  Flexible Time
HSST members have become increasingly interested in the concept of flexible time embedded in the trimester schedule since seeing that model implemented at Seaholm High School in Birmingham, Michigan.  When flexible time (otherwise known as resource or student assistance time) is embedded into a schedule, students have the ability to access teachers inside the school day but outside of an actual class period.  Often, this time is placed on the schedule once or twice per week (as was the case at Seaholm).  During that time, any student needing help or clarification can access a teacher; struggling students might be required to attend re-teaching or help sessions.  During the six-week gap between the end of a two-trimester AP course (mid-March) and the AP exam window (early May), teachers can hold review/refresher sessions for their students.  The list of options for how this time is structured and used is lengthy.

At the last meeting, HSST members were presented with a sample trimester schedule and some options for how time might be allocated to provide some amount of flexible/resource/student assistance time while still meeting the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction's requirement of 1,137 hours of instruction per year at the high school level. 

The HSST will continue to discuss this topic at its next meeting.

Monday, March 7, 2011

Date of Schedule Study Team Vote Determined

The 21-member Homestead Schedule Study Team (HSST), which includes School Board members, parents, students, faculty members, building-level administrators and district-level administrators, recently agreed on a date for conducting its final vote on the schedule study.

On Wednesday, March 30 all members of the HSST will participate in a blind balloting process.  At that time, each team member will vote for or against the proposal for Homestead to implement the five-period trimester schedule beginning in the 2012-2013 school year.  As of Friday, March 4, the HSST unanimously agreed to remove any other schedule options from consideration; when voting, team members will choose between the trimester and the current seven-period semester schedule.

Between now and March 30, two additional HSST meetings will be held, one on March 16 and another on March 25.  During those meetings, team members will discuss remaining questions involving the possible move to the trimester schedule.  Those essential questions are as follows:  Can the schedule be developed  so as to create opportunities for teacher/student collaboration outside the normal class schedule but within the start and end time of the school day?  How will music classes be offered in the trimester schedule?  And, given the fact that students will be able to earn up to 30 credits in the trimester schedule as compared to 28 in the current semester schedule, can/should the school district consider increasing the minimum number of credits required for graduation from Homestead High School?

In addition to the HSST meetings scheduled between now and March 30, faculty members will engage in further study/learning about the trimester schedule.  The early release day on Friday, March 11 is set aside exclusively for this work, as is an after-school faculty learning session slated for later this month.

The HSST vote on March 30 will determine whether or not the possible schedule change will move forward for further consideration.  If the team rejects the trimester option, the study process is over; the school will remain committed to the current seven-period semester schedule for the foreseeable future.  If the team supports the trimester, opportunities for student, parent, and faculty feedback on the possible schedule change will be offered, all occurring during the week of April 11-15.  This feedback will be advisory to Eric Dimmitt, Director of Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment for MTSD and me, the co-chairs of the study team.  If team members vote in favor of the trimester on March 30, Mr. Dimmitt and I will take all feedback gathered from then through mid-late April into consideration when drafting our recommendation to Dr. Means, the School Board, and the Negotiating Team from the Mequon-Thiensville Education Association, which must be submitted by May 4.

Major Findings from the West DePere Site Visit

Team members learned a great deal about the trimester during last week's one-day visit to West DePere High School outside of Green Bay.  Major findings/take-aways include the following:
 
Student Reaction:
·      Students expressed positive feelings about the length of periods, course choices, and the number of courses in which they are enrolled at any one time.  They also expressed positive feelings about starting a new schedule every 12 weeks, as that change adds variety to their routine and exposes them to different courses and teachers more regularly.
·      Homestead student visitors felt that the 70-minute class periods felt quicker than anticipated.
·      Homestead student visitors noticed the incorporation of distinct activities/transitions within periods.

Study Halls:
·      Students appreciated being able to schedule a study hall seasonally (fall, winter, spring) to correspond with sports or other activities.
·      Likely because the school’s philosophy emphasizes school work over home work, many students opt not to take a study hall in their schedule.

Advanced Placement:
·      The gap between the end of the second trimester and AP exams is a concern for many teachers.  Currently, many teachers offer before-school/after-school/weekend review sessions that are optional for students; these sessions are offered without compensation.  Several students explained that they like the time between the end of an AP course and the exam; they use this time for independent studying for the test while not being expected to learn new course simultaneously.
·      The school does not provide any time within the school day for students to access teachers for AP review/refreshers.
·      With the exception of AP Physics, all AP courses run first and second trimester.

Relationships between Teachers and Students:
·      Some teachers spoke of not feeling as well-connected with students, especially if they only saw them only one trimester, when compared to the semester schedule.  Students did not express this concern; they explained that they felt well-connected with their teachers and had time to develop strong interpersonal relationships with them.
·      Students and teachers explained that the change of trimesters is refreshing and invigorating; the school year has more variety when compared to a semester schedule.

Twelve-week Terms
·      Teachers have fewer contacts with students when compared to a semester schedule.  In courses like Physical Education where students should be developing long-term habits and where they benefit from prolonged physical activity as mandated by the curriculum, teachers fear that this reduced time may result in significant drop-off after the course ends.
·      Curricula must be reviewed and reconsidered to ensure that outcomes can be met in this timeframe. 
·      Some teachers reported reconsidering the homework that they assign in the trimester; reinforcement activities often happen in the classroom, while homework is set aside for activities that extend and solidify essential knowledge and skills.
·      Student attendance improved following the transition to the trimester schedule.
·      Some teachers reported not seeing students all year as a downside of the trimester when compared to a traditional schedule; still, teachers stated that their time in class with students (70 minutes per day) is much richer compared to 50-minute periods on the semester schedule.  Students did not express concern over having a year-long course for 120 days in the trimester as compared to 180 days in a semester schedule.

70-minute Periods
·      Unless special circumstances exist (a lab, for example), teachers are expected to include three distinct activities/transitions in a single period. 
·      Teachers of production-based courses like visual arts appreciate longer periods; they provide more time for student work relative to set-up, take-down, and clean-up.
·      Students did not report feeling that class times were too lengthy; most teachers shared that sentiment.

Special Features of the Schedule as Implemented at West DePere:
·      Juniors and seniors who meet certain expectations have a late start/early release option in which they do not report to school for either first or fifth period.
·      All students are required to enroll in at least 6.5 credits per year; no student may take more than two study halls per year and no more than one per trimester.
·      Some teachers have common prep times to support peer collaboration.  (Note:  Regardless of administrative scheduling efforts, more teachers will share a common time slot when on prep in the trimster; a prep can be scheduled in only one of five slots in that schedule as compared to one of seven slots in the seven-period day schedule).
·      The school has no formal exam week; exams are administered during the regular school day/week schedule.
·      The school offers a first trimester readiness course for Algebra, Geometry and English 9.  After completing that course, students enroll in the regular course for the second and third trimesters.
·      The schedule includes 10-minute passing periods.  Extended passing periods allow teachers to reset and prepare for their next class, students to ask follow-up questions after the dismissal bell sounds, and students to pop in on another teacher to ask a question or conduct course-related business.

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Site Visit to West DePere High School

Today, a group of faculty members, administrators, School Board members, and students traveled north to spend the day at West DePere High School outside of Green Bay.  West DePere implemented the five-period trimester schedule seven years ago following a multi-year study process.  Today's trip was the final campus visit to observe the trimester schedule and to interact with students, faculty and administrators teaching and learning in this arrangement.

The site visit team was comprised of the following individuals:

Joe Ordinans, Math Department Chair
Dan Benson, Physical Education and Health Department Chair
Jill McElroy, Guidance Department Chair *
Marianne Wallach, Latin Teacher *
John Emanuelson, Orchestra Teacher *
Scott Heibler, Science Teacher
Angie Cicero, English Teacher *
Joe Ciurlik, Social Studies Teacher
Molly Navarre, Special Education Teacher *
Matt Wolf, Business Education Teacher *
Kat Hustedde, Visual Arts Teacher
Michele Ziegler, Parent and School Board Member *
Eric Dimmitt, Director of Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment *
Brett Bowers, Principal *
Two students, one freshman and one sophomore *

*  HSST member

As occurred during the Michigan site visits two weeks ago, our team had the opportunity to hold extended conversations with job-alike peers, visit classrooms for extended and/or drop-in periods, hear a presentation from the principal and ask questions of him, talk with faculty members on a walk-up/informal basis, and interact with students.

The HSST is scheduled to meet this Friday afternoon, March 4.  At that time, team members will process the information gathered from the West DePere site visit.  Further, we will review and discuss the results from a phone interview conducted ealier this week; due to scheduling conflicts, representatives from Homestead and MTSD are not able to visit Neenah High School.  Still, on Monday of this week Eric Dimmitt, Associate Principals Amy Monroe and Steve Sukawaty, and I conducted an extensive telephone interview with the Administrative Team and Counseling Department Chair from Neenah High School.

Following this Friday's meeting, I will post the major findings from the West DePere visit.  Further, I will explain the timeline for concluding the schedule study process, making a decision about a preferred schedule at the committee level, and providing parent, student, and faculty information and input opportunities prior to a formal recommendation being made.